Remote is NOT a Result of a Placebo Effect

By | July 17, 2019

There are two experiences I’ll share which have me convinced the remote is NOT a result of a placebo effect:

1). When first running the remote, I had decided to run the Terrain Protocol. Without my sister knowing, I had placed her DNA sample [fingernail clipping] in the remote (She and I had discussed the remote beforehand and I had her permission to use her DNA sample, but she had no knowledge of the timing nor of the program being run). The day after I began the program, she contacted me and, after mentioning that the feeling was ‘too intense’, asked that I remove her sample from the remote. We discussed the likelihood of her sensations resulting from the Herx reaction. She said she’d think about it. I removed her DNA sample as requested. The following day she contacted me again and asked that I again place her sample in the remote. Without knowledge of when the program was run, and without knowledge of the program involved, she volunteered that she was experiencing something significant, which she could not attribute to anything other than the use of the remote which had been discussed days earlier.

2). A very good friend of mine had elected to contribute her two DNA samples (fingernail) for the two remotes being used for a group of close friends and relatives. I told her that she could call me anytime with questions or concerns. I had previously discussed with the group that I would not run anything which was symptom-specific (i.e., which would require specific lowering or raising of any particular function), but that I would only utilize frequencies specified as being balancing (for healing). We also discussed and agreed that killing pathogens would be fairly specific rather than general, as to avoid causing an imbalance of positive bacteria. Because she joined the group after the Terrain protocol, she did not have that preparation. In one remote I ran a program for balancing urinary system health, in the other remote was a sequence for killing fungus and mold. She contacted me a week later and mentioned that she had been having a migraine for three days. I brought up the fungus and mold killing, at which time she mentioned that she had a fungal infection. She was familiar with the Herx effect, and we both concluded that was occurring and likely the source of her migraine headache. During the same period (same programs), an uncle who had contributed his DNA sample sometime earlier, contacted me to discuss a sensation he had felt in his kidney. He was unaware that the program for the urinary system had started. He explained that the sensation he experienced was not painful and he interpreted the sensation as something positive. Again, both individuals were unaware of the specific programs being run.

These two anecdotal experiences, in the short time I’ve been using Spooky2/Spooky2 Remote have me convinced.

Best,

Travis

Spooky2 Remote

Source: https://www.spooky2.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=89&t=11035

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *